After the war, deceived as a 'domoy (to return home)' from the dominant region of Japan,
2019/2/9
Everyone who subscribes to Sankei Shimbun should have seen the Sankei Shimbun particularly shining this morning.
The Sankei argues only the truth as black as black, white as white.
Facing against Russia not giving an inch, on the contrary, on the controversy that the editorial adviser is dealing with the Ambassador of Russia to Japan.
As for the opinion of the article counselor, as for him, describing a complete fact refers to the editorial supposing that it isn't wrong at all.
In other words, the excellent journalist soul appeared in the Sankei Shimbun today.
It is a surrebuttal to the Russian Ambassador by our editorial adviser about the Northern Territories.
By Russian Galuzin Ambassador to Japan, Saito Tsutomu, an editorial adviser to the Sankei Shimbun, objected to the contents of the lecture on the Northern Territories issue by using SNS (membership exchange website).
In a speech, Mr. Saito talked about how the Soviet Union robbed the four northern islands after accepting Japan's Potsdam Declaration.
The Ambassador pointed out, 'Do you condemn the Soviet Union who participated in the war against Japan in 1945? Do you call the acquisition of the Yuzhno-Kurilsky District that was totally legitimated Crime'?
On the contrary, the Sankei Shimbun will post Mr. Saito's rebuttal.
= 2 pages 'argument' and 'Day of the Northern Territories'
About my remarks at the 'Kyushu Sound Argument social meeting' on January 24th, I received an 'objection' by my name from Russian.
He has the reputation of being a brilliant student of Japan School in the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but with all due respect, it is hard to say that it is a decent objection.
About the 'acquisition' of the 'Northern Territories' (referred to as Yuzhno-Kurilsky in Russia), he had an unfamiliar expression from the beginning: 'It was legally done.'
I thought some new evidence came out, but that was none.
It seems uncomfortable that 'acquisition' was excluded as a state' crime'.
I have been claiming that the Northern Territories and being carried away together with this one Japanese prisoner of war in the Soviet Union and the abduction case by North Korea is an unresolved 'national crime' after the war, so at this late hour, Ambassador's 'objection' is mea culpa.
The Soviet militaries tore the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact one-sidedly in August 1945, and when Japan entered the war, they invaded four islands of the unarmed body after yielding and occupied directly Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin by the order.
If this is not a 'crime,' what is it?
However, 'international crime' violates 'The Atlantic Charter,' which clearly states that the territory has no expansion in addition to the state crime.
It takes out that Japan was an alliance with Nazi Germany which did a Jewish holocaust about the Ambassador as the only material of the refutation to me.
Its relation can not be understood at all.
Hitler is 'the most sinful criminal,' but do you want to say that Stalin is different?
Do you say that Japan, too, is, therefore, a criminal, the same as Nazis in 'the ally'?
I want to ask you in reverse.
What 'did the holocaust' do Japan, when, and where?
Speaking of the 'death of factory' pointed out by the Ambassador, how will you explain the cruelty of Siberian detention?
After the war, deceived as a 'domoy (to return home)' from the dominant region of Japan, 600,000 Japanese were kidnapped to the frosty place, being abused by slave labor 60,000 (neither number is unknown), and also died an unnatural death.
In fact, my deceased father had gone through a lot of hardships as a detainee.
In 'The Katyn Massacre,' about 20,000 Polish officers were massacred in the western part of Russia during the Second World War.
Stalin consistently continued telling a big lie to the world as 'the work of Nazi Germany,' but in the international appeal of the Political government's persistent truth elucidation, the Gorbachev period finally gave him recognition as 'Stalin's crime.'
I also encourage you to read the world history textbooks widely by Mr. Galuzin.

• I could not stop tears while translating Saito's paper into English.
  Mr. Saito is also living life as a national treasure of Japan.