2022/4/7
The following is from the serial column of Masayuki Takayama, who brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
It is a must-read for the Japanese people and people around the world.

Dr. Song is a great woman.
The grand fiction of the Nanking Massacre is said to have been conceived by the Chinese.
It was not. Shina people may be good at imitating things but cannot develop such ideas.
No, no, no, Chiang Kai-shek had Harold Timpali, a correspondent of a British newspaper, write about the Nanking Massacre.
That is not true either.
He has actually worked for the U.S. opinion magazine Asia for a long time.
The magazine was under the U.S. Committee for Public Information (CPI) umbrella, run by Pearl Buck's husband, R. Walsh, and directed anti-Japanese propaganda.
The CPI consisted of the Secretary of State, the Secretaries of the Army and Navy, and representatives of the newspaper industry.
It used U.S. newspaper correspondents and missionaries dispatched to China to carry out anti-Japanese propaganda.
William Donald of the New York Herald, who flew with Soong Mei-ling to the Xi'an Incident, was one of them and threatened Chang Hsueh-liang to get him to release Chiang Kai-shek.
Although only circumstantial evidence exists, Donald said at the time, "The United States chose Chiang Kai-shek and gave Manchuria and Mongolia to China. Hit Japan as promised," he conveyed the words of U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR).
Chiang Kai-shek then caused the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, massacred more than 200 Japanese in Tongzhou, and finally had 60,000 elite troops attack the Japanese concession in Shanghai.
As FDR had hoped, Japan was engulfed in a quagmire war with China, extending its front lines to Nanjing and Wuhan.
FDR had the CPI carry out the "bad Japan invading good China" propaganda.
The fall of Nanking was also used as material.
U.S. newspaper correspondents all reported that "thousands were killed and women were assaulted.
The missionary Bates, also a servant of God, falsely claimed at the Tokyo Trials that "So Many Shina people were killed."
However, even the Chinese were not interested in the American-made story of the Nanking Massacre because they thought it was too false.
Later, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
After killing 200,000 innocent civilians, they had to bring up Nanking again as a countervailing factor.
First, the Asahi Shimbun, which bowed to GHQ, reported that "20,000 people were killed in four days in the city of Nanking, and pieces of mutilated flesh were scattered around the city" (December 8, 1945).
The company's cameraman, who was on the scene at the time, was taking pictures of smiling civilians and children alongside Japanese soldiers.
But 20,000 is too little to offset the atomic bombing.
So, in the Tokyo Tribunal decision, the number was raised by one order of magnitude to 200,000.
The court argued that this was equivalent to the number of non-combatants killed by the two atomic bombs.
A sane scholar would have tilted his head at the one-digit increase, but many others did not.
Akira Fujiwara of Hitotsubashi University and Tokushi Kasahara of Tsuru University actively supported the 200,000 figures.
However, in the smokescreen photo brought by Asahi, Fujiwara commented in Ken Shimura's style, "Yes, this is the poisonous gas of the Japanese army."
He was a scholar who did not care about the truth.
Kasahara, too, used a photo of women going home protected by the Japanese army as the frontispiece for his article, "Gangnam women abducted by the Japanese army" and "raped and killed."
He, too, was willing to lie.
However, Jiang Zemin, who wanted ODA, insisted on "300,000 people" and placed the words "300,000" on the Nanjing Memorial Hall to make it a permanent fixture.
Song Gengyi, a female teacher at Shanghai Aurora Vocational College, questioned this in class.
There is no data to support the 300,000," she said, "and we should not continue to hate them."
She taught that Nanjing is fictitious and the numbers are also fictional.
When a student took a hidden picture of it and posted it online, she was immediately "dismissed" (People's Daily).
The furor continues.
Li Tiantian, a female teacher in Hunan Province concerned about Song Gengyi's situation, took to social networking sites to "support her claim" and "punish the student who told on her."
Officials flew in, grabbed Li, and "with her family's approval" (Yomiuri) threw her into a psych ward.
Surprisingly, there were respectable women in China.
In contrast, the Asahi, which has been propagating the Nanking Massacre, has never published an account of these women.
On the contrary, it published Yutaka Yoshida, one of Akira Fujiwara's sworn brothers, to reaffirm its hurrah masochistic view of history.
Isn't it a shame to call yourself a newspaper?