頭の良さって何でしょうか？共通テストで高得点をとることでしょうか？それとも、東大やハーバード大学に合格することでしょうか？

私は、先にあげた全て、「ちょっと違う」と違和感を持っています。

本当に頭がいい人は、ノーベル賞をとったり、画期的な発明をしたり、そういう人ではないでしょうか？経済学や哲学などでも、長い論文を書ける人が本当に頭が良い人だと思います。古代ギリシャの哲学者なんかも本当に頭がいいと思います。近代哲学者のニーチェなんかもです。

しかし、悲しいかな、現代の資本主義国家では、「素早く結果を出す人」が求められます。なので、じっくりと長時間かけて結論を出す人は好まれません。なので、こうした長考タイプの人は資本主義では淘汰されます。よく、「ポスドク問題」がありますよね？ポスドクの人は頭がいいけど、民間企業は使いこなせないのだと思いますよ。

共通テストなんて、最悪なシステムだと思います。制限時間内にマークシートを鉛筆で塗りつぶす「作業」でしょう。あんなもので、教養や思考力を計測することはできませんよ。思考力は、素早く結論を出す思考と、じっくり時間をかけて結論を出す思考、二種類あると思います。特に、「クリエイティビティ」なんて、共通テストで評価することは絶対に不可能です。

新卒採用の面接、あれも駄目ですね。1時間以内に相手にアピールするためには、長考なんてしてる暇ないです。美辞麗句を言える人が高評価になるだけでしょう。

修士のように、学部の入試でも、論文（小論文じゃないよ、時間制限のない論文作成）による入学審査をやればいいと思えますよ。ま、全ての科目で論文を書くのは不可能なので、得意科目（または学部と関係ある科目）だけでよいと思えます。他は共通テストで評価すればいい。

What is intelligence?

Intelligence is a complex concept that has been debated by philosophers and scientists for centuries. There is no single definition of intelligence that is universally accepted, but it is generally understood to be the ability to learn, reason, and solve problems.

In Japan, intelligence is often measured by standardized tests such as the Center Test, which is used for university admissions. However, some people argue that these tests are not accurate measures of intelligence. They point out that the tests focus on a narrow range of skills, such as memorization and problem-solving, and that they do not take into account other important aspects of intelligence, such as creativity and critical thinking.

In the essay "頭の良さとは何か？" (What is intelligence?), the author argues that intelligence is not simply a matter of test scores or academic achievement. Instead, he believes that intelligence is best measured by real-world accomplishments, such as winning a Nobel Prize or making a groundbreaking invention. He also argues that modern capitalist societies value quick results over careful thought, which leads to the marginalization of people who are good at thinking deeply.

The author's argument is thought-provoking and challenges the traditional view of intelligence. It is important to consider whether standardized tests and academic achievement are the best ways to measure intelligence. If we want to create a society that values all forms of intelligence, we need to find new ways to assess intelligence that are more inclusive and holistic.

Here are some specific examples of how we can measure intelligence in a more inclusive and holistic way:

• Instead of focusing on standardized tests, we could focus on projects and assessments that require students to apply their knowledge and skills in real-world contexts. This would allow students to demonstrate their creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

• We could also focus on assessments that measure non-cognitive skills, such as creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving. These skills are just as important as cognitive skills, and they are often overlooked in traditional assessments.

• Finally, we could focus on assessments that are more inclusive of different cultures and perspectives. This would help to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their intelligence.

By taking these steps, we can create a more just and equitable society that values all forms of intelligence.